About:

Můjpass.cz is a large online database of venues where Sodexo clients use their employee benefits. The goal was a complete redesign, taking into account the planned rebrand from Sodexo to Pluxee.

Category:

UX/UI design

Client:

Pluxee (Sodexo)

Year:

2022 – 2023

Location:

Prague, Czech Republic

Design framework:

Design Thinking

Tools:

Figma, Pluxee Design System, Teams, Dovetail

The problem:

Users weren't failing to find benefit venues because they weren't there, but because the interface buried them: broken filters, outdated content, no mobile logic. Engagement and revenue were dropping.

Goal:

Design an intuitive, mobile-first search aligned with the new Pluxee identity, improve orientation and increase revenue through better merchant visibility.

My role:

UX/UI designer, end to end: stakeholder interview, research, the company's first UX workshops, wireframes, A/B testing and Pluxee UI.

Methods:

•

Stakeholder interviews

•

Service Safari

•

Internal interviews

•

Analytics review

•

Moderated qualitative research

•

Empathy mapping and personas

•

Competitive analysis

•

HMW workshop and dot voting

•

Crazy 8's design studio

•

Wireframing and prototyping

•

Guerrilla and moderated usability testing

Empathize

I needed to understand why users were leaving, what the organisation thought the problem was, and where those two stories didn't line up.

/01

Stakeholder interview

“We need to optimise our current venue search so existing users get a clear overview of where to use their employee benefits. The second goal is to show relevant merchants to relevant users and so increase revenue for the company.” Jakub Mačát, Head of Product Communication and Digital Assets.

Using the 5 Whys, I got a complete picture of the project's background from the company's perspective.

Jakub Močák
“We need to optimise our current venue search so existing users get a clear overview of where to use their employee benefits.”
Jakub Močák · Head of Product Communication and Digital Assets

/02

Service Safari

I became an HR manager who wants to take colleagues to lunch nearby and pay with paper meal vouchers. Illustrative photos on the website were misleading, the map was cluttered and loaded slowly, venue information was thin and outdated, and the filter system was overcomplicated.

Map overloaded
Map overloaded
Slow load, raw results
Slow load, raw results
Outdated info and photos
Outdated info and photos

/03

Internal interviews

Sales didn't want any change to the data: the huge venue database, however limited, was their key selling point. Development confirmed technical limits and earlier failed attempts to improve it. Customer support confirmed everything the Service Safari had shown.

Three departments, three definitions of the problem
Three departments, three definitions of the problem

/04

Data and statistics

Google Analytics and Hotjar confirmed the assumptions. 48.5% of visitors use a mobile device and only 32% are logged in. 50% use filtering and 41% open a venue detail, but just 6% click a venue on the map, 1.8% filter other services and 1.5% use “My location”. Core features I expected to be used constantly reached only half of the users.

Google Analytics and Hotjar
Google Analytics and Hotjar

/05

Moderated research

Semi-structured, online sessions with existing users validated the hypotheses and set the direction.

“There's no short description of the restaurant.” Margita D.

“Honestly? When I can't find it, I turn to Google, which is quite often.” Jana N.

Moderated usability testing9–16 Dec 2022Zoom and Teams7 participantsHR, customer support, end users
85%
found a venue and understood which benefits they could use there
57%
managed to use the filters without any doubt or difficulty
7/7
reacted negatively to the illustrative stock photos
6/7
criticised how the map worked
5/7
had trouble filtering venues
3/7
were unsure what the category names meant
2/7
wanted more information on the venue detail
1/7
used full-text search, then gave up and went to Google
“Honestly? When I can't find it, I just go to Google. Which is often.”
JNJana N. · End user, moderated session
“There's no description. Just the name of the restaurant.”
MDMargita D. · End user, moderated session
Product names nobody could tell apart
Product names nobody could tell apart
The same stock photo everywhere, and a map nobody trusted
The same stock photo everywhere, and a map nobody trusted

/06

Empathy map, journey and competitors

Empathy maps broke each session into what people thought, felt, saw, heard, said and did. The user journey showed exactly where searching breaks down, and the competitive analysis showed how direct competitors on the Czech market solve the same task.

Empathy map
01 · Empathy map
User journey
02 · User journey
Competitive analysis
03 · Competitive analysis

Define

Three personas and one design challenge with two problems at its core.

/01

Personas

Three personas built from moderated research, customer support insights and my own experience.

/02

Design challenge

Two problems stood out: poor or missing venue content, and problematic filtering. I presented the challenge to management, sales, marketing and development.

Where users drop off: no info to decide
Where users drop off: no info to decide

Ideate

The first UX workshops in the company's history.

/01

How Might We workshop

An icebreaker where everyone drew and presented their avatar opened the first joint UX workshop. During voting, old unresolved conflicts surfaced: sales, development and management each saw the problem differently. That confrontation turned out to be productive, and we agreed on shared solutions democratically.

How Might We
01 · How Might We
Ideas from every department
02 · Ideas from every department

/02

Crazy 8's and dot voting

In the second design studio the team created 24 concepts for the homepage and the venue detail, then voted on the strongest.

Crazy 8's sketches
Crazy 8's sketches

Prototype & test

Two wireframes, tested side by side.

/01

Wireframes

From the workshop results we chose two variants of the search homepage, which I built as wireframes in Figma.

Two wireframe models in Figma
Two wireframe models in Figma

/02

A/B testing

Guerrilla tests with colleagues first, then moderated semi-structured sessions with the same users who had tested the original search. Model B won and I redrew it in the new Pluxee visual identity.

Round 1
Guerrilla testing
Fast internal pass with colleagues to catch the obvious breakages in both wireframes.
Round 2
Moderated sessions
Same semi-structured format, with the same users who had tested the original search.
Model A
Tested side by side with Model B
Model B
WINNER
Redrawn in the new Pluxee visual identity

Implementation

From a validated model to a changed plan.

/01

UI and visual identity

Sodexo became Pluxee, with a global UI library and design system. The biggest challenge was creating components the system didn't have yet, such as a strict layout for the search sections.

Search with categories, filters and popular venues
01 · Search with categories, filters and popular venues
Venue detail with gallery, accepted products and opening hours
02 · Venue detail with gallery, accepted products and opening hours

/02

Iteration with development

I presented the research to the development team and answered every question about features and behaviour so they could estimate the effort.

Working through questions with developers
Working through questions with developers

/03

Change of priorities

Development split the work into two phases, rebranding and redesign. With the project lead we decided to ship the rebranding first: a new visual style on the existing functionality. The whole product still depends on a legacy system that needs a complete technical rebuild, and the redesign would have hit implementation much harder. The redesign was put on hold.

Redesign put on hold, rebrand first
Redesign put on hold, rebrand first

Outcome

A shipped rebrand and an open redesign.

/01

Conclusion

Můjpass.cz has the potential to become an excellent product. After a year of rebranding and the fast move from Sodexo to Pluxee, the research needs revisiting because the data is now outdated and may be skewed. The redesign remains an open question.

/02

The presentation

The full case study as I presented it.

Slide 4
Slide 5
Slide 7
Slide 8
Slide 9
Slide 10
Slide 11
Slide 12
Slide 13
Slide 14
Slide 15
Slide 16
Slide 17
Slide 18
Slide 19
Slide 20
Slide 21
Slide 22
Slide 23
Slide 4
Slide 5
Slide 7
Slide 8
Slide 9
Slide 10
Slide 11
Slide 12
Slide 13
Slide 14
Slide 15
Slide 16
Slide 17
Slide 18
Slide 19
Slide 20
Slide 21
Slide 22
Slide 23
© More works
(WDX®)
digital design

© help centre
(WDX)
clarification

FAQ.

Pavel Danyi

Defining outcomes through a transparent process and honest dialogue.

01

What services do you offer?

02

What is your typical turnaround time?

03

How do you identify what users truly need?

04

Why invest in research instead of jumping straight into design?

05

What exactly is the "output" of your work?

What services do you offer?

What is your typical turnaround time?

How do you identify what users truly need?

Why invest in research instead of jumping straight into design?

What exactly is the "output" of your work?

Pavel Danyi

Let’s talk